Abstract
Recommendation systems are usually evaluated through accuracy and classification metrics. However, when these systems are supported by crowdsourced data, such metrics are unable to estimate data authenticity, leading to potential unreliability. Consequently, it is essential to ensure data authenticity and processing transparency in large crowdsourced recommendation systems. In this work, processing transparency is achieved by explaining recommendations and data authenticity is ensured via blockchain smart contracts. The proposed method models the pairwise trust and system-wide reputation of crowd contributors; stores the contributor models as smart contracts in a private Ethereum network; and implements a recommendation and explanation engine based on the stored contributor trust and reputation smart contracts. In terms of contributions, this paper explores trust and reputation smart contracts for explainable recommendations. The experiments, which were performed with a crowdsourced data set from Expedia, showed that the proposed method provides cost-free processing transparency and data authenticity at the cost of latency. © 2020, The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Abstract

Abstract
The use of adequate relay selection techniques is crucial to improve the behavior of cooperation based approaches in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN). The Optimized Relay Selection Technique (ORST) is a relay selection technique that may be reduced to the application on classic set-covering problem (SCP) to WSN. The SCP seeks to find a minimum number of sets that contain all elements of all data sets. The SCP can be solved with different types of algorithms. This paper assesses the performance and quality of three different algorithms to solve the SCP generated by the previously proposed ORST technique, considering performance metrics relevant within WSNs context. The analysis was performed by simulation using the OMNeT++ tool and the WSN framework Castalia. The simulation results show that the branch and bound algorithm excels when compared to other state-of-the-art approaches.

Abstract
Forecasting vineyard yield with accuracy is one of the most important trends of research in viticulture today. Conventional methods for yield forecasting are manual, require a lot of labour and resources and are often destructive. Recently, image-analysis approaches have been explored to address this issue. Many of these approaches encompass cameras deployed on ground platforms that collect images in proximal range, on-the-go. As the platform moves, yield components and other image-based indicators are detected and counted to perform yield estimations. However, in most situations, when image acquisition is done in non-disturbed canopies, a high fraction of yield components is occluded. The present work's goal is twofold. Firstly, to evaluate yield components' visibility in natural conditions throughout the grapevine's phenological stages. Secondly, to explore single bunch images taken in lab conditions to obtain the best visible bunch attributes to use as yield indicators. In three vineyard plots of red (Syrah) and white varieties (Arinto and Encruzado), several canopy 1 m segments were imaged using the robotic platform Vinbot. Images were collected from winter bud stage until harvest and yield components were counted in the images as well as in the field. At pea-sized berries, veraison and full maturation stages, a bunch sample was collected and brought to lab conditions for detailed assessments at a bunch scale. At early stages, all varieties showed good visibility of spurs and shoots, however, the number of shoots was only highly and significantly correlated with the yield for the variety Syrah. Inflorescence and bunch occlusion reached high percentages, above 50 %. In lab conditions, among the several bunch attributes studied, bunch volume and bunch projected area showed the highest correlation coefficients with yield. In field conditions, using non-defoliated vines, the bunch projected area of visible bunches presented high and significant correlation coefficients with yield, regardless of the fruit's occlusion. Our results show that counting yield components with image analysis in non-defoliated vines may be insufficient for accurate yield estimation. On the other hand, using bunch projected area as a predictor can be the best option to achieve that goal, even with high levels of occlusion.

Abstract
Saliency maps have been used as one possibility to interpret deep neural networks. This method estimates the relevance of each pixel in the image classification, with higher values representing pixels which contribute positively to classification.The goal of this study is to understand how the complexity of the network affects the interpretabilty of the saliency maps in classification tasks. To achieve that, we investigate how changes in the regularization affects the saliency maps produced, and their fidelity to the overall classification process of the network.The experimental setup consists in the calculation of the fidelity of five saliency map methods that were compare, applying them to models trained on the CIFAR-10 dataset, using different levels of weight decay on some or all the layers.Achieved results show that models with lower regularization are statistically (significance of 5%) more interpretable than the other models. Also, regularization applied only to the higher convolutional layers or fully-connected layers produce saliency maps with more fidelity. © 2020 IEEE.

Abstract
Researchers in a variety of fields are increasingly adopting crowdsourcing as a reliable instrument for performing tasks that are either complex for humans and computer algorithms. As a result, new forms of collective intelligence have emerged from the study of massive crowd-machine interactions in scientific work settings as a field for which there is no known theory or model able to explain how it really works. Such type of crowd work uses an open participation model that keeps the scientific activity (including datasets, methods, guidelines, and analysis results) widely available and mostly independent from institutions, which distinguishes crowd science from other crowd-assisted types of participation. In this paper, we build on the practical challenges of crowd-AI supported research and propose a conceptual framework for addressing the socio-technical aspects of crowd science from a CSCW viewpoint. Our study reinforces a manifested lack of systematic and empirical research of the symbiotic relation of AI with human computation and crowd computing in scientific endeavors.