João Mello

Abstract
Energy communities (EC) and collective self-consumption (CSC) systems can make a significant contribution to reducing dependence on fossil fuels and energy costs. They create mechanisms for the active participation of end-consumers in the energy system by becoming self-producers of renewable electricity and adapting their energy behavior to the needs of the system. CSC also alleviates energy poverty by reducing the energy costs of vulnerable members. The CSC is still in its early stages, and regulation is being developed in several countries along with pilot projects to test different rules and incentives. This chapter discusses the most relevant common definitions of CSC and EC so far, as well as the main challenges in relation to energy sharing rules and the management of EC and CSC. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Abstract
Purpose of Review: This paper reviews the flexibility-centric value chain (FCVC) and analyses how coordinating digital platforms along the FCVC is essential for enabling FCVC activities and supporting key actors. Based on the FCVC, the digital infrastructure needed to support flexibility provision in power systems is reviewed, with special focus on the role of energy communities (ECs) as emerging relevant actors and potential aggregators of its members. Recent Findings: We review the Grid Data and Business Network (GDBN), a platform developed by the authors to support the FCVC, with special focus on those stages of the FCVC not properly supported by existing solutions. It also analyses platforms used in local flexibility markets (LFMs), and it presents the RECreation digital platform designed to manage ECs to support the participation in flexibility markets. Summary: Digital platforms are necessary for scaling flexibility services. The GDBN offers a comprehensive approach by enabling the FCVC and facilitating interoperability with existing platforms dedicated to specific segments, such as ECs and LFMs. By addressing current limitations in platform integration, this paper contributes to a clearer understanding of how digital tools can enable an efficient flexibility ecosystem. © The Author(s) 2025.

Abstract
Distributed energy resources (DERs) offer untapped potential to meet the flexibility needs of power systems with a high share of non-dispatchable renewable generation, and local flexibility markets (LFMs) can be effective mechanisms for procuring it. In LFMs, energy communities (ECs) can aggregate and offer flexibility from their members' DERs to other parties. However, since flexibility prices are only known after markets clear, flexibility bidding curves can be used to deal with this price uncertainty. Building on previous work by the authors, this paper employs a two-stage methodology to calculate flexibility bids for an EC participating in an LFM, including not only batteries and photovoltaic panels, but also cross-sector (CS) flexible assets like thermal loads and electric vehicles (EVs) to assess their impact. In Stage 1, the EC manager minimizes the energy bill without flexibility to define its baseline. In Stage 2, it computes the optimal flexibility to be offered for each flexibility price to build the flexibility bidding curve. Case examples allow to assess the impact of CS flexible assets on the final flexibility offered.

Abstract
Planning Energy communities (ECs) requires engaging members, designing business models and governance rules, and sizing distributed energy resources (DERs) for a cost-effective investment. Meanwhile, the growing share of non-dispatchable renewable generation demands more flexible energy systems. Local flexibility markets (LFMs) are emerging as effective mechanisms to procure this flexibility, granting ECs a new revenue stream. Since sizing with flexibility becomes a highly complex problem, we propose a 2-stage methodology for estimating DERs size in an EC with collective self-consumption, flexibility provision and cross-sector (CS) assets such as thermal loads and electric vehicles (EVs). The first stage computes the optimal DER capacities to be installed for each member without flexibility provision. The second stage departs from the first stage capacities to assess how to modify the initial capacities to profit from providing flexibility. The impact of data clustering and flexibility provision are assessed through a case study.

Abstract
Deploying renewable energy communities, self-consumption and local energy markets are one of the ways to contribute to the energy system decarbonization by increasing the renewable energy share in the production mix and contributing to a better local balancing. However, how collective self-consumption structures are regulated has a direct impact on the flexibility of the energy sharing mechanisms and business models that can be set up. This paper compares and discusses how the European Union directives on self-consumption have been transposed to the national regulations of Portugal, Spain and France, providing a detailed regulatory discussion on the definition of basic concepts such as individual and collective self-consumption and renewable energy communities, proximity rules among members, energy sharing mechanisms and energy allocation coefficients, how the energy surplus is managed in each case, or how the grid access tariffs are modified to account for the self-consumed energy. The study highlights that dynamic allocation coefficients provide significant advantages for collective self-consumption by improving energy allocation efficiency, enabling advanced business models, and facilitating the integration of local energy markets, as it is the case in Portugal and France, while their absence in Spain limits these opportunities. The work also highlights the trade-off between flexible energy sharing and implementation complexity, and the role of digital tools to operationalize energy communities. Suggestions on potential regulatory improvements for all countries are also proposed. © 2025