Abstract
The development of groupware systems can be supported by the perspectives provided by taxonomies categorizing collaboration systems and theoretical approaches from the multidisciplinary field of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). In the last decades, multiple taxonomic schemes were developed with different classification dimensions, but only a few addressed the socio-technical perspective that encompasses the interaction between groups of people and technology in work contexts. Moreover, there is an ambiguity in the use of the categories presented in the literature. Aiming to tackle this vagueness and support the development of future groupware systems aware of social phenomena, we present a comprehensive classification model to interrelate technological requirements with CSCW dimensions of communication, coordination, cooperation, time and space, regulation, awareness, group dynamics, and complementary categories obtained from a taxonomic literature review. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Abstract
Solid research depends on systematic, verifiable and repeatable scientometric analysis. However, scientometric analysis is difficult in the current research landscape characterized by the increasing number of publications per year, intersections between research domains, and the diversity of stakeholders involved in research projects. To address this problem, we propose SciCrowd, a hybrid human-AI mixed-initiative system, which supports the collaboration between Artificial Intelligence services and crowdsourcing services. This work discusses the design and evaluation of SciCrowd. The evaluation is focused on attitudes, concerns and intentions towards use. This study contributes a nuanced understanding of the interplay between algorithmic and human tasks in the process of conducting scientometric analysis.

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
When crowd workers provide their contributions in a shared working environment, they may be influenced by the inputs of other contributors in implicit ways. Stigmergy in crowdsourcing consists of tracking changes in work activities to guide crowd workers based on the digital traces left by other workers. In such scenarios, there is no direct communication between the contributors. Still, the traceable changes they left during their actions act as a mediating element that clearly affects the final work product. From a behavior analysis perspective, the properties recorded in event logs can be of practical value in observing the behavioral traces produced by crowd workers when performing microtasks. This form of task fingerprinting has been explored for over a decade to better understand performance-related data and user navigational behavior in crowdsourcing markets. In line with this, the goal of this paper is to study the feasibility of task fingerprinting alongside the stigmergic effect occurring in a crowdsourcing setting through a user event logger. To this end, a case study was conducted using a real-world scenario of extreme weather phenomena represented on interactive maps. Each user could observe the traces of other crowd members while providing annotations. Twelve experts in weather forecasting were recruited to participate in this study to annotate extreme weather events. The results indicate that it is possible to use task fingerprinting for tracking the stigmergic effect in such activities with gains in terms of implicit coordination. Furthermore, the task fingerprinting allowed to map participants with similar behavioral traces, suggesting an increase in the accuracy of annotation clusters.