Abstract
Energy community developers are relevant actors for the deployment of energy communities as they can overcome initial investment costs and better navigate complex licensing processes. Their strategy depends on the chosen business model, typically aimed at maximizing their profit while providing tangible benefits to the potential members of the energy communities to encourage their engagement. This works describes strategies for an energy management system adapted to energy community developers whose business model consists in installing, owning and managing energy assets (such as photovoltaic panels and batteries) in its own facilities and in the facilities of those energy community members able and willing to provide them, to sell the locally produced energy for self-consumption in the energy community.

Abstract
The increasing integration of renewable energy sources and decentralized generation requires demand-side flexibility to improve grid stability and balance local energy flows. Local Flexibility Markets (LFMs) provide a framework for optimizing flexibility transactions within energy communities. This paper presents a model for quantifying and pricing residential resources flexibility, enabling prosumers to submit bids in an LFM managed by the Community Manager. The methodology relies on a linear optimization problem, where a Home Energy Management System first determines optimal consumption baselines. Then an iterative sensitivity analysis estimates upward, and downward flexibility bands and sets offer prices per resource. The market operates as two asymmetric voluntary pools, clearing flexibility offers and requests. Results show that Battery Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles provide the most effective flexibility, significantly reducing energy costs. Future research should improve pricing mechanisms and scalability to support LFM adoption in different residential settings.

Abstract
Renewable energy resources are crucial for addressing global economic and environmental challenges. Energy communities, which unite consumers to pursue shared energy goals, present a promising solution for reducing energy costs and enhancing sustainability. This study analyzes the optimal sizing and operation of energy community resources, formulating the problem as mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models. Two tools are employed: one for daily operation, calculating energy setpoints for community assets such as battery energy storage systems (BESS) and electric vehicles (EVs), and another for sizing photovoltaic (PV) panels and BESS capacities to minimize costs while optimizing local energy trades. Due to the high computational demands of MILP, three optimization methods are compared: deterministic, hybrid particle swarm optimization (PSO), and evolutionary PSO (EPSO). The hybrid PSO method handles binary and continuous variables efficiently, while EPSO introduces diversity to improve solution quality in complex scenarios. These metaheuristic approaches address the trade-off between solution accuracy and computational effort, providing reliable tools for decision-makers in energy communities.

Abstract
Local flexibility markets are a promising solution to aid system operators in managing the network as it faces the growth of distributed resources and the resulting impacts on voltage control, among other factors. This paper presents and simulates a proposal for an intra-day local flexibility market based on grid segmentation. The design provides a market-based solution for distribution system operators (DSOs) to address near-real-time grid issues. The grid segmentation computes the virtual buses that represent each zone and the sensitivity indices that approximate the impact of activating active power flexibility in the buses within the zone. This approach allows DSOs to manage and publish their flexibility needs per zone and enables aggregators to offer flexibility by optimizing their resource portfolios per zone. The simulation outcomes allow for the assessment of market performance according to the number of zones computed and show that addressing overloading and voltage control through zonal approaches can be cost-effective and counterbalance minor errors compared to node-based approaches.

Abstract
Deploying renewable energy communities, self-consumption and local energy markets are one of the ways to contribute to the energy system decarbonization by increasing the renewable energy share in the production mix and contributing to a better local balancing. However, how collective self-consumption structures are regulated has a direct impact on the flexibility of the energy sharing mechanisms and business models that can be set up. This paper compares and discusses how the European Union directives on self-consumption have been transposed to the national regulations of Portugal, Spain and France, providing a detailed regulatory discussion on the definition of basic concepts such as individual and collective self-consumption and renewable energy communities, proximity rules among members, energy sharing mechanisms and energy allocation coefficients, how the energy surplus is managed in each case, or how the grid access tariffs are modified to account for the self-consumed energy. The study highlights that dynamic allocation coefficients provide significant advantages for collective self-consumption by improving energy allocation efficiency, enabling advanced business models, and facilitating the integration of local energy markets, as it is the case in Portugal and France, while their absence in Spain limits these opportunities. The work also highlights the trade-off between flexible energy sharing and implementation complexity, and the role of digital tools to operationalize energy communities. Suggestions on potential regulatory improvements for all countries are also proposed. © 2025

Abstract
The business models (BM) for renewable energy communities (REC) are often based on their promoters being the sole or primary investors in energy assets, such as photovoltaic panels (PV) and battery energy storage systems (BESS), operating these assets centrally, and selling the locally produced energy to the REC members. This research addresses the computation of fixed local energy prices that the REC developer may apply under the optimal operation of the energy assets to maximize its revenues, while guaranteeing that all REC members benefit from belonging to the REC. We do this from two perspectives, depending on who operates the storage systems: i) maximizing the investor's benefits and ii) minimizing the REC cost by maximizing its self-consumption, ensuring maximization of the energy sold by the REC promoter/investor. The optimization framework includes energy production and demand balance constraints, peak load limitations, and constraints coming from the Portuguese regulatory framework. It also considers the opportunity costs of the members for buying the energy deficit from the grid or selling the energy surplus to the grid.