Abstract
In this work we perform a detailed study of different or-scheduling strategies varying several parameters in two or-parallel systems, YapOr and ThOr, running on multi-core machines. Our results show that some kinds of applications are sensitive to the choice of scheduling strategy adopted. In particular, the choice of scheduling parameters mostly affect applications that have short execution times, which, despite having speedups, have their performance significantly affected. Our results also show that topmost dispatching can be more advantageous than bottommost dispatching, a finding that contradicts previous works in this area. One last finding is that YapOr and ThOr are affected differently by changes in scheduling with ThOr performing significantly better than YapOr in several applications.

Abstract
Prolog programs have explicit parallelism, that is, parallelism which can be exploited by a machine with minimal user effort. Or-parallelism is one such form of parallelism, and is particularly useful in that it is present in the many Prolog applications where several alternatives need to be considered. Or-parallelism has been exploited successfully in several systems, and especially in the Aurora and Muse systems. In this paper we analyze the portability of these two parallel systems onto a commercial shared memory parallel computer, a Sun SPARCcenter 2000 with 8 processors, running the Solaris 2.2 Operating System. We also analyze both systems' performance for classical benchmark programs and for two large Prolog applications.

Abstract
One important advantage of logic programming is that it allows the implicit exploitation of parallelism. Towards this goal, we suggest that or-parallelism can be efficiently exploited in tabling systems and propose two alternative approaches, Or-Parallelism within Tabling (OPT) and Tabling within Or-Parallelism (TOP). We concentrate on the fundamental concepts of an environment copying based model to implement the OPT approach and introduce the data structures and algorithms necessary to extend the YapOr Or-Parallel system, in order to obtain a parallel tabling system.

Abstract
This paper presents DAOS, a model for exploitation of Andand Or-parallelism in logic programs. DAOS assumes a physically distributed memory environment and a logically shared address space. Exploiting both major forms of implicit parallelism should serve a broadest range of applications. Besides, a model that uses a distributed memory environment provides scalability and can be implemented over a computer network. However, distributed implementations of logic programs have to deal with communication overhead and inherent complexity of distributed memory managent. DAOS overcomes those problems through the use of a distributed shared memory layer to provide single-writer, multiple-readers sharing for the main execution stacks combined with explicit message passing for work distribution and management.

Abstract
One of the advantages of logic programming is the fact that it offers many sources of implicit parallelism, such as and-parallelism and or-parallelism. Arguably, or-parallel systems, such as Aurora and Muse, have been the most successful parallel logic programming systems so far. Or-parallel systems rely on techniques such as Environment Copying to address the problem that branches being explored in parallel may need to assign different bindings for the same shared variable. Recent research has led to two new binding representation approaches that also support independent and-parallelism: the Sparse Binding Array and the Copy-On-Write binding models. In this paper, we investigate whether these newer models are practical alternatives to copying for or-parallelism. We based our work on YapOr, an or-parallel copying system using the YAP Prolog engine, so that the three alternative systems share schedulers and the underlying engine.

Abstract