Abstract

In modern, high-speed work settings, the significance of mental health disorders is increasingly acknowledged as a pressing health issue, with potential adverse consequences for organizations, including reduced productivity and increased absenteeism. Over the past few years, various mental health management solutions, such as biofeedback applications, have surfaced as promising avenues to improve employees' mental well-being.

Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of different hyperparameter tuning strategies for peer-to-peer risk management. Ensemble learning techniques have shown superior performance in this field compared to individual classifiers and traditional statistical methods. However, model performance is influenced not only by the choice of algorithm but also by hyperparameter tuning, which impacts both predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. This research compares the performance and efficiency of three widely used hyperparameter tuning methods, Grid Search, Random Search, and Optuna, across XGBoost, LightGBM, and Logistic Regression models. The analysis uses the Lending Club dataset, spanning from 2007 Q1 to 2020 Q3, with comprehensive data preprocessing to address missing values, class imbalance, and feature engineering. Model explainability is assessed through feature importance analysis to identify key drivers of default probability. The findings reveal comparable predictive performance among the tuning methods, evaluated using metrics such as G-mean, sensitivity, and specificity. However, Optuna significantly outperforms the others in computational efficiency; for instance, it is 10.7 times faster than Grid Search for XGBoost and 40.5 times faster for LightGBM. Additionally, variations in feature importance rankings across tuning methods influence model interpretability and the prioritization of risk factors. These insights underscore the importance of selecting appropriate hyperparameter tuning strategies to optimize both performance and explainability in peer-to-peer risk management models.

Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea is a heterogeneous sleep disorder with varying phenotypes. Several studies have already performed cluster analyses to discover various obstructive sleep apnea phenotypic clusters. However, the selection of the clustering method might affect the outputs. Consequently, it is unclear whether similar obstructive sleep apnea clusters can be reproduced using different clustering methods. In this study, we applied four well-known clustering methods: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering; K-means; Fuzzy C-means; and Gaussian Mixture Model to a population of 865 suspected obstructive sleep apnea patients. By creating five clusters with each method, we examined the effect of clustering methods on forming obstructive sleep apnea clusters and the differences in their physiological characteristics. We utilized a visualization technique to indicate the cluster formations, Cohen's kappa statistics to find the similarity and agreement between clustering methods, and performance evaluation to compare the clustering performance. As a result, two out of five clusters were distinctly different with all four methods, while three other clusters exhibited overlapping features across all methods. In terms of agreement, Fuzzy C-means and K-means had the strongest (kappa = 0.87), and Agglomerative hierarchical clustering and Gaussian Mixture Model had the weakest agreement (kappa = 0.51) between each other. The K-means showed the best clustering performance, followed by the Fuzzy C-means in most evaluation criteria. Moreover, Fuzzy C-means showed the greatest potential in handling overlapping clusters compared with other methods. In conclusion, we revealed a direct impact of clustering method selection on the formation and physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea clusters. In addition, we highlighted the capability of soft clustering methods, particularly Fuzzy C-means, in the application of obstructive sleep apnea phenotyping.

Abstract
Predictive maintenance (PDM) is emerging as a strong transformative tool within Industry 4.0, enabling significant improvements in the sustainability and efficiency of manufacturing processes. This in-depth literature review, which follows the PRISMA 2020 framework, examines how PDM is being implemented in several areas of the manufacturing industry, focusing on how it is taking advantage of technological advances such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT). The presented in-depth evaluation of the technological principles, implementation methods, economic consequences, and operational improvements based on academic and industrial sources and new innovations is performed. According to the studies, integrating CDM can significantly increase machine uptime and reliability while reducing maintenance costs. In addition, the transition to PDM systems that use real-time data to predict faults and plan maintenance more accurately holds out promising prospects. However, there are still gaps in the overall methodologies for measuring the return on investment of PDM implementations, suggesting an essential research direction.

Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy. The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted. Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1-14), present results (2. Results, statements 15-16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17-18). The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.

Abstract
This chapter examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Learning Analytics (LA) are transforming distance education, accelerated by the COVID-19 shift to e-learning. By using data from Learning Management Systems (LMS), these technologies can personalize learning, improve student retention, and automate tasks. AI, particularly machine learning, enables dynamic adaptation to student needs, while LA provides valuable insights for informed instructional decisions. However, ethical concerns, including data privacy and algorithmic bias, must be addressed to ensure equitable access and fair learning outcomes. The future of distance learning lies in responsible integration of AI and LA, creating immersive and inclusive educational experiences.