Abstract

Abstract
[No abstract available]

Abstract

Abstract
This report describes the ICDAR 2025 Competition on Automatic Classification of Literary Epochs (ICDAR 2025 CoLiE), which consisted of two tasks focused on automatic prediction of the time in which a book was written (date of first publication). Both tasks comprised two sub-tasks, where a related fine-grained classification was addressed. Task 1 consisted of the identification of literary epochs, such as Romanticism or Modernism (sub-task 1.1), and a more precise classification of the period within the epoch (sub-task 1.2). Task 2 addressed the chronological identification of century (sub-task 2.1) or decade (sub-task 2.2). The compiled dataset and the reported findings are valuable to the scientific community and contribute to advancing research in the automatic dating of texts and its applications in digital humanities and temporal text analysis. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Abstract
Humour poses a unique challenge for artificial intelligence, as it often relies on non-literal language, cultural references, and linguistic creativity. The JOKER Lab, now in its fourth year, aims to advance computational humour research through shared tasks on curated, multilingual datasets, with applications in education, computer-mediated communication and translation, and conversational AI. This paper provides an overview of the JOKER Lab held at CLEF 2025, detailing the setup and results of its three main tasks: (1) humour-aware information retrieval, which involves searching a document collection for humorous texts relevant to user queries in either English or Portuguese; (2) pun translation, focussed on humour-preserving translation of paronomastic jokes from English into French; and (3) onomastic wordplay translation, a task addressing the translation of name-based wordplay from English into French. The 2025 edition builds upon previous iterations by expanding datasets and emphasising nuanced, manual evaluation methods. The Task 1 results show a marked improvement this year, apparently due to participants' judicious combination of retrieval and filtering techniques. Tasks 2 and 3 remain challenging, not only in terms of system performance but also in terms of defining meaningful and reliable evaluation metrics.

Abstract