Abstract
We address the layout optimization problem of deciding the number, the location, and the operational space of a set of Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) units, which overall constitute an AWE farm. The layout optimization problem in conventional wind farms, with standard wind turbines, is a well-studied subject; however, in the case of AWE, there are several new characteristics and challenges. While in the case of conventional wind farms, the main concern is to guarantee a reduced aerodynamical wake effect from other units, in AWE the main concern is to avoid collision among units. The optimization problem addressed is the following: given a specific land dimension and local wind characteristics, we solve a bi-objective problem of maximizing power production while minimizing the number of units, by deciding the number of producing units, their locations, as well as their flight envelopes. The solution method uses a combination of metaheuristic methods, including elements from the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) and the Biased Random Key Genetic Algorithm (BRKGA). The results produce a custom Pareto set adapted to the wind local characteristics, allowing for a more accurate estimation of the key objectives, better estimate of the annual power output of the AWE farm, and make better-informed decisions regarding the optimal number of units to deploy in the farm.

Abstract
Performance evaluation increasingly assumes a more important role in any organizational environment. In the transport area, the drivers are the company’s image and for this reason it is important to develop and increase their performance and commitment to the company goals. This evaluation can be used to motivate driver to improve their performance and to discover training needs. This work aims to create a performance appraisal evaluation model of the drivers based on the multi-criteria decision aid methodology. The MMASSI (Multicriteria Methodology to Support Selection of Information Systems) methodology was adapted by using a template supporting the evaluation according to the freight transportation company in study. The evaluation process involved all drivers (collaborators being evaluated), their supervisors and the company management. The final output is a ranking of the drivers, based on their performance, for each one of the scenarios used.

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract