Cookies
O website necessita de alguns cookies e outros recursos semelhantes para funcionar. Caso o permita, o INESC TEC irá utilizar cookies para recolher dados sobre as suas visitas, contribuindo, assim, para estatísticas agregadas que permitem melhorar o nosso serviço. Ver mais
Aceitar Rejeitar
  • Menu
Publicações

Publicações por Maria João Cardoso

2012

SIMULTANEOUS DETECTION OF PROMINENT POINTS ON BREAST CANCER CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT IMAGES

Autores
Oliveira, HP; Cardoso, JS; Magalhaes, A; Cardoso, MJ;

Publicação
2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP 2012)

Abstract
Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment (BCCT) is now the preferred technique for breast cancer treatment. The limited reproducibility of standard aesthetic evaluation methods led to the development of objective methods, such as Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. cosmetic results (BCCT. core) software tool. Although the satisfying results, there are still limitations concerning complete automation and the inability to measure volumetric information. With the fundamental premise of maintaining the system as a low-cost tool, the incorporation of the Microsoft Kinect sensor in BCCT evaluations was studied. The aim with this work is to enable the simultaneous detection of breast contour and breast peak points using depth-map data. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is accurate and robust for a wide number of patients. Additionally, comparatively to previous research, the procedure for detecting prominent points was automated.

2007

Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment

Autores
Cardso, JS; Cardos, MJ;

Publicação
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE

Abstract
Objective: This work presents a novel approach for the automated prediction of the aesthetic result of breast cancer conservative treatment (BCCT). Cosmetic assessment plays a major rote in the study of BCCT. Objective assessment methods are being preferred to overcome the drawbacks of subjective evaluation. Methodology: The problem is addressed as a pattern recognition task. A dataset of images of patients was classified in four classes (excellent, good, fair, poor) by a panel of international experts, providing a gold standard classification. As possible types of objective features we considered those already identified by domain experts as relevant to the aesthetic evaluation of the surgical procedure, namely those assessing breast asymmetry, skin colour difference and scar visibility. A classifier based on support vector machines was developed from objective features extracted from the reference dataset. Results: A correct classification rate of about 70% was obtained when categorizing a set of unseen images into the aforementioned four classes. This accuracy is comparable with the result of the best evaluator from the panel of experts. Conclusion: The results obtained are rather encouraging and the developed tool, could be very helpful in assuring objective assessment of the aesthetic outcome of BCCT.

2007

Is face-view only enough for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment (BCCT)?

Autores
Cardoso, MJ; Cardoso, JS; Vrieling, C; Christie, D; Joahensen, J; Costa, S; Almeida, T;

Publicação
EJC SUPPLEMENTS

Abstract

2008

Comparing two objective methods for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment

Autores
Cardoso, MJ; Cardoso, JS; Wild, T; Krois, W; Fitzal, F;

Publicação
EJC SUPPLEMENTS

Abstract

2008

Long-term cosmetic changes after breast conserving therapy for patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated in the EORTC "boost versus no boost" trial

Autores
Immink, M; Putter, H; Visser, J; Bartelink, H; Cardoso, J; Cardoso, MJ; Noordijk, EM; Poortmans, PM; Warlam Rodenhuis, CC; Struikmans, H;

Publicação
EJC SUPPLEMENTS

Abstract

2004

Aesthetic evaluation of conservative breast cancer treatment. Can measuring help?

Autores
Cardoso, MJ; Leitao, I; Moura, AJ; Santos, AC; Cardoso, J; Barros, H; Oliveira, MC;

Publicação
EJC SUPPLEMENTS

Abstract

  • 5
  • 8