Abstract
We present DIO, a generic tool for observing inefficient and erroneous I/O interactions between applications and in-kernel storage systems that lead to performance, dependability, and correctness issues. DIO facilitates the analysis and enables near real-time visualization of complex I/O patterns for data-intensive applications generating millions of storage requests. This is achieved by non-intrusively intercepting system calls, enriching collected data with relevant context, and providing timely analysis and visualization for traced events. We demonstrate its usefulness by analyzing two production-level applications. Results show that DIO enables diagnosing resource contention in multi-threaded I/O that leads to high tail latency and erroneous file accesses that cause data loss.

Abstract
We present DIO, a generic tool for observing inefficient and erroneous I/O interactions between applications and in-kernel storage backends that lead to performance, dependability, and correctness issues. DIO eases the analysis and enables near real-time visualization of complex I/O patterns for data-intensive applications generating millions of storage requests. This is achieved by non-intrusively intercepting system calls, enriching collected data with relevant context, and providing timely analysis and visualization for traced events. We demonstrate its usefulness by analyzing four production-level applications. Results show that DIO enables diagnosing inefficient I/O patterns that lead to poor application performance, unexpected and redundant I/O calls caused by high-level libraries, resource contention in multithreaded I/O that leads to high tail latency, and erroneous file accesses that cause data loss. Moreover, through a detailed evaluation, we show that, when comparing DIO's inline diagnosis pipeline with a similar state-of-the-art solution, our system captures up to 28x more events while keeping tracing performance overhead between 14% and 51%.

Abstract
The adoption of third-party machine learning (ML) cloud services is highly dependent on the security guarantees and the performance penalty they incur on workloads for model training and inference. This paper explores security/performance trade-offs for the distributed Apache Spark framework and its ML library. Concretely, we build upon a key insight: in specific deployment settings, one can reveal carefully chosen non-sensitive operations (e.g. statistical calculations). This allows us to considerably improve the performance of privacy-preserving solutions without exposing the protocol to pervasive ML attacks. In more detail, we propose Soteria, a system for distributed privacy-preserving ML that leverages Trusted Execution Environments (e.g. Intel SGX) to run computations over sensitive information in isolated containers (enclaves). Unlike previous work, where all ML-related computation is performed at trusted enclaves, we introduce a hybrid scheme, combining computation done inside and outside these enclaves. The experimental evaluation validates that our approach reduces the runtime of ML algorithms by up to 41% when compared to previous related work. Our protocol is accompanied by a security proof and a discussion regarding resilience against a wide spectrum of ML attacks.

Abstract

Abstract
Cryptographic ransomware attacks are constantly evolving by obfuscating their distinctive features (e.g., I/O patterns) to bypass detection mechanisms and to run unnoticed at infected servers. Thus, efficiently exploring the I/O behavior of ransomware families is crucial so that security analysts and engineers can better understand these and, with such knowledge, enhance existing detection methods. In this paper, we propose CRIBA, an open-source framework that simplifies the exploration, analysis, and comparison of I/O patterns for Linux cryptographic ransomware. Our solution combines the collection of comprehensive information about system calls issued by ransomware samples, with a customizable and automated analysis and visualization pipeline, including tailored correlation algorithms and visualizations. Our study, including 5 Linux ransomware families, shows that CRIBA provides comprehensive insights about the I/O patterns of these attacks while aiding in exploring common and differentiating traits across families.

Abstract
We present LAZYFS, a new fault injection tool that simplifies the debugging and reproduction of complex data durability bugs experienced by databases, key-value stores, and other data-centric systems in crashes. Our tool simulates persistence properties of POSIX file systems (e.g., operations ordering and atomicity) and enables users to inject lost and torn write faults with a precise and controlled approach. Further, it provides profiling information about the system's operations flow and persisted data, enabling users to better understand the root cause of errors. We use LAZYFS to study seven important systems: PostgreSQL, etcd, Zookeeper, Redis, LevelDB, PebblesDB, and Lightning Network. Our fault injection campaign shows that LAZYFS automates and facilitates the reproduction of five known bug reports containing manual and complex reproducibility steps. Further, it aids in understanding and reproducing seven ambiguous bugs reported by users. Finally, LAZYFS is used to find eight new bugs, which lead to data loss, corruption, and unavailability.