Abstract
This paper introduces a method to build dynamic logics with a graded semantics. The construction is parametrized by a structure to support both the spaces of truth and of the domain of computations. Possible instantiations of the method range from classical (assertional) dynamic logic to less common graded logics suitable to deal with programs whose transitional semantics exhibits fuzzy or weighted behaviour. This leads to the systematic derivation of program logics tailored to specific program classes.

Abstract
Dynamic logic combines logic with programs, which at a certain level of abstraction, can be regarded as behaviours changing the system state and, therefore, the truth value of formulas. This paper suggests a method for generating such logics for the domain of robot controllers and illustrates it with a logic for handling resource consumption.

Abstract
Reconfigurability, understood as the ability of a system to behave differently in different modes of operation and commute between them along its lifetime, is a cross-cutting concern in modern Software Engineering. This paper introduces a specification method for reconfigurable software based on a global transition structure to capture the system's reconfiguration space, and a local specification of each operation mode in whatever logic (equational, first-order, partial, fuzzy, probabilistic, etc.) is found expressive enough for handling its requirements. In the method these two levels are not only made explicit and juxtaposed, but formally interrelated. The key to achieve such a goal is a systematic process of hybridisation of logics through which the relationship between the local and global levels of a specification becomes internalised in the logic itself.

Abstract
In the last decades, dynamic logics have been used in different domains as a suitable formalism to reason about and specify a wide range of systems. On the other hand, logics with many-valued semantics are emerging as an interesting tool to handle devices and scenarios where uncertainty is a prime concern. This paper contributes towards the combination of these two aspects through the development of a method for the systematic construction of many-valued dynamic logics. Technically, the method is parameterised by an action lattice that defines both the computational paradigm and the truth space (corresponding to the underlying Kleene algebra and residuated lattices, respectively).

Abstract
Architectural (bad) smells are design decisions found in software architectures that degrade the ability of systems to evolve. This paper presents an approach to verify that a software architecture is smell-free using the Archery architectural description language. The language provides a core for modelling software architectures and an extension for specifying constraints. The approach consists in precisely specifying architectural smells as constraints, and then verifying that software architectures do not satisfy any of them. The constraint language is based on a propositional modal logic with recursion that includes: a converse operator for relations among architectural concepts, graded modalities for describing the cardinality in such relations, and nominals referencing architectural elements. Four architectural smells illustrate the approach.

Abstract
The wide number of languages and programming paradigms, as well as the heterogeneity of ‘programs’ and ‘executions’ require new generalisations of propositional dynamic logic. The dynamisation method, introduced in [20], contributed on this direction with a systematic parametric way to construct Many-valued Dynamic Logics able to handle systems where the uncertainty is a prime concern. The instantiation of this method with the Lukasiewicz arithmetic lattice over [0, 1], that we derive here, supports a general setting to design and to (fuzzy-) reason about systems with uncertainty degrees in their transitions. For the verification of real systems, however, there are no de facto methods to accommodate exact truth degrees or weights. Instead, the traditional approach within scientific community is to use different kinds of approximation techniques. Following this line, the current paper presents a framework where the representation values are given by means of intervals. Technically this is achieved by considering an ‘interval version’ of the Kleene algebra based on the [0, 1] Lukasiewicz lattice. We also discuss the ‘intervalisation’ of L action lattice (in the lines reported in [28]) and how this class of algebras behaves as an (interval) semantics of many-valued dynamic logic. © Springer International Publishing AG 2016.