Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
Evaluating predictive models is a crucial task in predictive analytics. This process is especially challenging with time series data because observations are not independent. Several studies have analyzed how different performance estimation methods compare with each other for approximating the true loss incurred by a given forecasting model. However, these studies do not address how the estimators behave for model selection: the ability to select the best solution among a set of alternatives. This paper addresses this issue. The goal of this work is to compare a set of estimation methods for model selection in time series forecasting tasks. This objective is split into two main questions: (i) analyze how often a given estimation method selects the best possible model; and (ii) analyze what is the performance loss when the best model is not selected. Experiments were carried out using a case study that contains 3111 time series. The accuracy of the estimators for selecting the best solution is low, despite being significantly better than random selection. Moreover, the overall forecasting performance loss associated with the model selection process ranges from 0.28 to 0.58%. Yet, no considerable differences between different approaches were found. Besides, the sample size of the time series is an important factor in the relative performance of the estimators.

Abstract
The early detection of anomalous events in time series data is essential in many domains of application. In this paper we deal with critical health events, which represent a significant cause of mortality in intensive care units of hospitals. The timely prediction of these events is crucial for mitigating their consequences and improving healthcare. One of the most common approaches to tackle early anomaly detection problems is through standard classification methods. In this paper we propose a novel method that uses a layered learning architecture to address these tasks. One key contribution of our work is the idea of pre-conditional events, which denote arbitrary but computable relaxed versions of the event of interest. We leverage this idea to break the original problem into two hierarchical layers, which we hypothesize are easier to solve. The results suggest that the proposed approach leads to a better performance relative to state of the art approaches for critical health episode prediction.

Abstract
Time series forecasting is one of the most active research topics. Machine learning methods have been increasingly adopted to solve these predictive tasks. However, in a recent work, evidence was shown that these approaches systematically present a lower predictive performance relative to simple statistical methods. In this work, we counter these results. We show that these are only valid under an extremely low sample size. Using a learning curve method, our results suggest that machine learning methods improve their relative predictive performance as the sample size grows. The R code to reproduce all of our experiments is available at https://github.com/vcerqueira/MLforForecasting.