Abstract
Advances in artificial intelligence trigger transformations that make more and more companies enter Industry 4.0 and 5.0 eras. In many cases, these transformations are gradual and performed in a bottom-up manner. This means that in the first step, the industrial hardware is upgraded to collect as much data as possible without actual planning of the utilization of the information. Furthermore, the data storage and processing infrastructure is prepared to keep large volumes of historical data accessible for further analysis. Only in the last step are methods for processing the data developed to improve or gain more insight into the industrial and business processes. Such a pipeline makes many companies face a problem with huge amounts of data, an incomplete understanding of how the existing knowledge is represented in the data, under which conditions the knowledge no longer holds, or what new phenomena are hidden inside the data. We argue that this gap needs to be addressed by the next generation of XAI methods which should be expert-oriented and focused on knowledge generation tasks rather than model debugging. The paper is based on the findings of the EU CHIST-ERA project on Explainable Predictive Maintenance (XPM).

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
The field of Explainable Predictive Maintenance (PM) is concerned with developing methods that can clarify how AI systems operate in the PM domain. One of the challenges of creating maintenance plans is integrating AI output with human decision-making processes and expertise. For AI to be helpful and trustworthy, fault predictions must be contextualized and easily comprehensible to humans. This involves providing tailored explanations to different actors depending on their roles and needs. For example, engineers can be connected to technical installation blueprints, while managers can evaluate system downtime costs, and lawyers can assess safety-threatening failures' potential liability. In many industries, black-box AI systems analyze sensor data to predict failures by detecting anomalies and deviations from typical behavior with impressive accuracy. However, PM is just one part of a broader context that aims to identify the most probable causes, develop a recovery plan, and estimate remaining useful life while providing alternative solutions. Achieving this requires complex interactions among various actors in industrial and decision-making processes. Our tutorial explores current trends, promising research directions in Explainable AI (XAI) relevant to Explainable Predictive Maintenance (XPM), and future challenges and open issues on this topic. We will also present three case studies that highlight XPM's challenges in bus and train operations and steel factories.

Abstract
Algae blooms are ecological events associated with extremely high abundance value of certain algae. These rare events have a strong impact in the river's ecosystem. In this context, the prediction of such events is of special importance. This paper addresses the problems that result from evaluating and comparing models at the prediction of rare extreme values using standard evaluation statistics. In this context, we describe a new evaluation statistic that we have proposed in Torgo and Ribeiro [Torgo, L., Ribeiro, R., 2006. Predicting rare extreme values. In: Ng, W, Kitsuregawa, M., Li, J., Chang, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the loth Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discover and Data Mining (PAKDD'2006). Springer, pp. 816-820 (number 3918 in LNAI)], which can be used to identify the best models for predicting algae blooms. We apply this new statistic in a comparative study involving several models for predicting the abundance of different groups of phytoplankton in water samples collected in Douro River, Porto, Portugal. Results show that the proposed statistic identifies a variant of a Support Vector Machine as outperforming the other models that were tried in the prediction of algae blooms.

Abstract
Utilitybased learning is a key technique for addressing many real world data mining applications, where the costs/benefits are not uniform across the domain of the target variable. Still, most of the existing research has been focused on classification problems. In this paper we address a related problem. There are many relevant domains (e. g. ecological, meteorological, finance) where decisions are based on the forecast of a numeric quantity (i.e. the result of a regression model). The goal of the work on this paper is to present an evaluation framework for applications where the numeric outcome of a regression model may lead to different costs/benefits as a consequence of the actions it entails. The new metric provides a more informed estimate of the utility of any regression model, given the application-specific preference biases, and hence makes more reliable the comparison and selection between alternative regression models. We illustrate the objective of our evaluation methodology on a real-life application and also carry a set of experiments over a subset of our target regression tasks: the prediction of rare and extreme values. Results show the effectiveness of our proposed utility metric for identifying the models that perform better on this type of applications.