2023
Authors
Barbosa, S; Silva, ME; Dias, N; Rousseau, D;
Publication
Abstract
2023
Authors
Molina, M;
Publication
2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
Abstract
2023
Authors
Nunes, Gonçalo Duarte;
Publication
Abstract
2023
Authors
Munna, TA; Ascenso, A;
Publication
2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP
Abstract
Recently, learning-based image compression has attracted a lot of attention, leading to the development of a new JPEG AI standard based on neural networks. Typically, this type of coding solution has much lower encoding complexity compared to conventional coding standards such as HEVC and VVC (Intra mode) but has much higher decoding complexity. Therefore, to promote the wide adoption of learning-based image compression, especially to resource-constrained (such as mobile) devices, it is important to achieve lower decoding complexity even if at the cost of some coding efficiency. This paper proposes a complexity scalable decoder that can control the decoding complexity by proposing a novel procedure to learn the filters of the convolutional layers at the decoder by varying the number of channels at each layer, effectively having simple to more complex decoding networks. A regularization loss is employed with pruning after training to obtain a set of scalable layers, which may use more or fewer channels depending on the complexity budget. Experimental results show that complexity can be significantly reduced while still allowing a competitive rate-distortion performance.
2023
Authors
Amorim, JP; Abreu, PH; Santos, JAM; Müller, H;
Publication
CoRR
Abstract
2023
Authors
Santos, JC; Abreu, MH; Santos, MS; Duarte, H; Alpoim, T; Próspero, I; Sousa, S; Abreu, PH;
Publication
ONCOLOGIST
Abstract
This article compares the effectiveness of the PET/CT scan and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Background Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become in recent years a tool for breast cancer (BC) staging. However, its accuracy to detect bone metastases is classically considered inferior to bone scintigraphy (BS). The purpose of this work is to compare the effectiveness of bone metastases detection between PET/CT and BS. Materials and Methods Prospective study of 410 female patients treated in a Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2014 and 2020 that performed PET/CT and BS for staging purposes. The image analysis was performed by 2 senior nuclear medicine physicians. The comparison was performed based on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on a patient and anatomical region level and was assessed using McNemar's Test. An average ROC was calculated for the anatomical region analysis. Results PET/CT presented higher values of accuracy and sensitivity (98.0% and 93.83%), surpassing BS (95.61% and 81.48%) in detecting bone disease. There was a significant difference in favor of PET/CT (sensitivity 93.83% vs. 81.48%), however, there is no significant difference in eliminating false positives (specificity 99.09% vs. 99.09%). PET/CT presented the highest accuracy and sensitivity values for most of the bone segments, only surpassed by BS for the cranium. There was a significant difference in favor of PET/CT in the upper limb, spine, thorax (sternum) and lower limb (pelvis and sacrum), and in favor of BS in the cranium. The ROC showed that PET/CT has a higher sensitivity and consistency across the bone segments. Conclusion With the correct imaging protocol, PET/CT does not require BS for patients with BC staging.
The access to the final selection minute is only available to applicants.
Please check the confirmation e-mail of your application to obtain the access code.