Abstract
Students in computing education increasingly use large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT. Yet, the role of LLMs in supporting cognitively demanding tasks, like deductive program verification, remains poorly understood. This paper investigates how students interact with an LLM when solving formal verification exercises in Dafny, a language that supports functional correctness by allowing programmers to write formal specifications and automatically verifying that the implementation satisfies the specification. We conducted a mixed-methods study with master's students enrolled in a formal methods course. Each participant completed two verification problems, one with access to a custom ChatGPT interface that logged all interactions and the other without. We identified strategies used by successful students and assessed the level of trust students place in LLMs. Our findings show that students perform significantly better when using ChatGPT; however, performance gains are tied to prompt quality. We conclude with practical recommendations for integrating LLMs into formal methods courses more effectively, including designing LLM-aware challenges that promote learning.

Abstract
Formal verification has recently been increasingly used to prove the correctness and security of many applications. It is attractive because it can prove the absence of errors with the same certainty as mathematicians proving theorems. However, while most security experts recognize the value of formal verification, the views of non-technical users on this topic are unknown. We designed and implemented two experiments to address this issue to understand how formal verification impacts users. Our approach started with a formative study involving 15 participants, followed by the main quantitative study with 200 individuals. We focus on the application domain of Password Managers (PMs) since it has been documented that the lack of trust in PMs might lead to lower adoption. Moreover, recent efforts have focused on formally verifying (parts of) PMs. We conclude that formal verification is seen as desirable by users and identify three actionable recommendations to improve formal verification communication efforts.

Abstract
The United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlights the importance of energy-efficient software to reduce the global carbon footprint. Programming languages and execution models strongly influence software energy consumption, with interpreted languages generally being less efficient than compiled ones. Lua illustrates this trade-off: despite its popularity, it is less energy-efficient than greener and faster languages such as C. This paper presents an empirical study of Lua's runtime performance and energy efficiency across 25 official interpreter versions and just-in-time (JIT) compilers. Using a comprehensive benchmark suite, we measure execution time and energy consumption to analyze Lua's evolution, the impact of JIT compilation, and comparisons with other languages. Results show that all LuaJIT compilers significantly outperform standard Lua interpreters. The most efficient LuaJIT consumes about seven times less energy and runs seven times faster than the best Lua interpreter. Moreover, LuaJIT approaches C's efficiency, using roughly six times more energy and running about eight times slower, demonstrating the substantial benefits of JIT compilation for improving both performance and energy efficiency in interpreted languages. © 2026 IEEE.

Abstract

Abstract
High-performance computing is pivotal for processing large datasets and executing complex simulations, ensuring faster and more accurate results. Improving the performance of software and scientific workflows in such environments requires careful analysis of their computational behavior and energy consumption. Therefore, maximizing computational throughput in these environments, through adequate software configuration and resource allocation, is essential for improving performance. The work presented in this paper focuses on leveraging regression-based machine learning and decision trees to analyze and optimize resource allocation in high-performance computing environments based on application's performance and energy metrics. Applied to a bioinformatics case study, these models enable informed decision-making by selecting the appropriate computing resources to enhance the performance of a phylogenomics software. Our contribution is to better explore and understand the efficient resource management of supercomputers, namely Santos Dumont. We show that the predictions for application's execution time using the proposed method are accurate for various amounts of computing nodes, while energy consumption predictions are less precise. The application parameters most relevant for this work are identified and the relative importance of each application parameter to the accuracy of the prediction is analysed.

Abstract