Abstract
With the ever-growing complexity of deep learning models for face recognition, it becomes hard to deploy these systems in real life. Researchers have two options: 1) use smaller models; 2) compress their current models. Since the usage of smaller models might lead to concerning biases, compression gains relevance. However, compressing might be also responsible for an increase in the bias of the final model. We investigate the overall performance, the performance on each ethnicity subgroup and the racial bias of a State-of-the-Art quantization approach when used with synthetic and real data. This analysis provides a few more details on potential benefits of performing quantization with synthetic data, for instance, the reduction of biases on the majority of test scenarios. We tested five distinct architectures and three different training datasets. The models were evaluated on a fourth dataset which was collected to infer and compare the performance of face recognition models on different ethnicity.

Abstract
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is the major diagnostic tool for the leading cause of blindness in developed countries: Diabetic Macular Edema (DME). Depending on the type of fluid accumulations, different treatments are needed. In particular, Cystoid Macular Edemas (CMEs) represent the most severe scenario, while Diffuse Retinal Thickening (DRT) is an early indicator of the disease but a challenging scenario to detect. While methodologies exist, their explanatory power is limited to the input sample itself. However, due to the complexity of these accumulations, this may not be enough for a clinician to assess the validity of the classification. Thus, in this work, we propose a novel approach based on multi-prototype networks with vision transformers to obtain an example-based explainable classification. Our proposal achieved robust results in two representative OCT devices, with a mean accuracy of 0.9099 ± 0.0083 and 0.8582 ± 0.0126 for CME and DRT-type fluid accumulations, respectively.

Abstract
This paper presents the main contributions of the VCMI Team to the ImageCLEFmedical Caption 2023 task. We addressed both the concept detection and caption prediction tasks. Regarding concept detection, our team employed different approaches to assign concepts to medical images: multi-label classification, adversarial training, autoregressive modelling, image retrieval, and concept retrieval. We also developed three model ensembles merging the results of some of the proposed methods. Our best submission obtained an F1-score of 0.4998, ranking 3rd among nine teams. Regarding the caption prediction task, our team explored two main approaches based on image retrieval and language generation. The language generation approaches, based on a vision model as the encoder and a language model as the decoder, yielded the best results, allowing us to rank 5th among thirteen teams, with a BERTScore of 0.6147.

Abstract
Pulse oximeters measure peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) noninvasively, while the gold standard (SaO2) involves arterial blood gas measurement. There are known racial and ethnic disparities in their performance. BOLD is a new comprehensive dataset that aims to underscore the importance of addressing biases in pulse oximetry accuracy, which disproportionately affect darker-skinned patients. The dataset was created by harmonizing three Electronic Health Record databases (MIMIC-III, MIMIC-IV, eICU-CRD) comprising Intensive Care Unit stays of US patients. Paired SpO2 and SaO2 measurements were time-aligned and combined with various other sociodemographic and parameters to provide a detailed representation of each patient. BOLD includes 49,099 paired measurements, within a 5-minute window and with oxygen saturation levels between 70-100%. Minority racial and ethnic groups account for ~25% of the data - a proportion seldom achieved in previous studies. The codebase is publicly available. Given the prevalent use of pulse oximeters in the hospital and at home, we hope that BOLD will be leveraged to develop debiasing algorithms that can result in more equitable healthcare solutions.

Abstract
This paper introduces an evaluation procedure to validate the efficacy of explanation methods for Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models in ordinal regression tasks. Two ordinal methods are contrasted against a baseline using cross-entropy, across four datasets. A statistical analysis demonstrates that attribution methods, such as Grad-CAM and IBA, perform significantly better when used with ordinal regression CNN models compared to a baseline approach in most ordinal and nominal metrics. The study suggests that incorporating ordinal information into the attribution map construction process may improve the explanations further.

Abstract
The development of accurate methods for OCT image analysis is highly dependent on the availability of large annotated datasets. As such datasets are usually expensive and hard to obtain, novel approaches based on deep generative models have been proposed for data augmentation. In this work, a flow-based network (SRFlow) and a generative adversarial network (ESRGAN) are used for synthesizing high-resolution OCT B-scans from low-resolution versions of real OCT images. The quality of the images generated by the two models is assessed using two standard fidelity-oriented metrics and a learned perceptual quality metric. The performance of two classification models trained on real and synthetic images is also evaluated. The obtained results show that the images generated by SRFlow preserve higher fidelity to the ground truth, while the outputs of ESRGAN present, on average, better perceptual quality. Independently of the architecture of the network chosen to classify the OCT B-scans, the model's performance always improves when images generated by SRFlow are included in the training set.