2013
Authors
Neto, P; Pires, JN; Moreira, AP;
Publication
IECON 2013 - 39th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Vienna, Austria, November 10-13, 2013
Abstract
2013
Authors
Neto, P; Pereira, D; Pires, JN; Moreira, AP;
Publication
2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany, May 6-10, 2013
Abstract
2013
Authors
Neto, P; Pires, JN; Moreira, AP;
Publication
CoRR
Abstract
2013
Authors
Neto, P; Mendes, N; Araújo, R; Pires, JN; Moreira, AP;
Publication
CoRR
Abstract
2013
Authors
Barbosa, Tiago M.; Morais, J.E.; Gonçalves, José; Marinho, D.A.; Silva, A.J.;
Publication
XV Brazilian Congress of Biomechanics
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to identify active drag determinants and classify swimmers based on such features.
67 young swimmers made a maximal 25m Front-Crawl to measure with a speedo-meter the swimming velocity (v), speed-fluctuation (dv) and dv normalized to v (dv/v). Another two 25m bouts with and without a perturbation
device were made to estimate active drag coefficient (CDa). Trunk transverse surface area (S) was measured with photogrammetric technique on-land and in the hydrodynamic position. Cluster 1 was related to swimmers
with a high speed fluctuation (i.e., dv and dv/v). Cluster 2 was characterized by the anthropometrics (i.e., S). Cluster 3 was associated with the high hydrodynamic profile (i.e.,CDa). The variable that seems to discriminate better the clusters was the dv/v (F=53.680; P<0.001), followed by the dv (F=28.506; P<0.001), CDa (F=21.025; P<0.001), S (F=6.297; P<0.01) and v (F=5.375; P=0.01). Stepwise discriminant analysis extracted 2 functions. Function 1 was mainly defined by dv/v and S (74.3% of variance), while Function 2 was mainly defined by CDa (25.7% of variance). So, it can be concluded that kinematics, anthropometrics and hydrodynamic features are determinant domains to classify and characterize swimmers’ profiles.
2013
Authors
Faria, BM; Ferreira, LM; Reis, LP; Lau, N; Petry, M;
Publication
PROGRESS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, EPIA 2013
Abstract
Assistive Technologies may greatly contribute to give autonomy and independence for individuals with physical limitations. Electric wheelchairs are examples of those assistive technologies and nowadays each time becoming more intelligent due to the use of technology that provides assisted safer driving. Usually, the user controls the electric wheelchair with a conventional analog joystick. However, this implies the need for an appropriate methodology to map the position of the joystick handle, in a Cartesian coordinate system, to the wheelchair wheels intended velocities. This mapping is very important since it will determine the response behavior of the wheelchair to the user manual control. This paper describes the implementation of several joystick mappings in an intelligent wheelchair (IW) prototype. Experiments were performed in a realistic simulator using cerebral palsy users with distinct driving abilities. The users had 6 different joystick control mapping methods and for each user the usability and the users' preference order was measured. The results achieved show that a linear mapping, with appropriate parameters, between the joystick's coordinates and the wheelchair wheel speeds is preferred by the majority of the users.
The access to the final selection minute is only available to applicants.
Please check the confirmation e-mail of your application to obtain the access code.