Cookies
O website necessita de alguns cookies e outros recursos semelhantes para funcionar. Caso o permita, o INESC TEC irá utilizar cookies para recolher dados sobre as suas visitas, contribuindo, assim, para estatísticas agregadas que permitem melhorar o nosso serviço. Ver mais
Aceitar Rejeitar
  • Menu
Publicações

Publicações por Konstantinos Bletsas

2013

Assigning real-time tasks on heterogeneous multiprocessors with two unrelated types of processors

Autores
Raravi, G; Andersson, B; Bletsas, K;

Publicação
REAL-TIME SYSTEMS

Abstract
Consider the problem of partitioned scheduling of an implicit-deadline sporadic task set on heterogeneous multiprocessors to meet all deadlines. Each processor is either of type-1 or type-2. We present a new algorithm, FF-3C, for this problem. FF-3C offers low time-complexity and provably good performance. Specifically, FF-3C offers (i) a time-complexity of O(na <...max(m,logn)+ma <...logm), where n is the number of tasks and m is the number of processors and (ii) the guarantee that if a task set can be scheduled by an optimal partitioned-scheduling algorithm to meet all deadlines then FF-3C meets all deadlines as well if given processors at most times as fast (referred to as speed competitive ratio) and tasks are scheduled using EDF; where alpha is a property of the task set. The parameter alpha is in the range (0,0.5] and for each task, it holds that its utilization is no greater than alpha or greater than 1-alpha on each processor type. Thus, the speed competitive ratio of FF-3C can never exceed 2. We also present several extensions to FF-3C; these offer the same performance guarantee and time-complexity but with improved average-case performance. Via simulations, we compare the performance of our new algorithms and two state-of-the-art algorithms (and variations of the latter). We evaluate algorithms based on (i) running time and (ii) the necessary multiplication factor, i.e., the amount of extra speed of processors that the algorithm needs, for a given task set, so as to succeed, compared to an optimal task assignment algorithm. Overall, we observed that our new algorithms perform significantly better than the state-of-the-art. We also observed that our algorithms perform much better in practice, i.e., the necessary multiplication factor of the algorithms is much smaller than their speed competitive ratio. Finally, we also present a clustered version of the new algorithm.