Abstract

Abstract

Abstract
Research in imbalanced domain learning has almost exclusively focused on solving classification tasks for accurate prediction of cases labelled with a rare class. Approaches for addressing such problems in regression tasks are still scarce due to two main factors. First, standard regression tasks assume each domain value as equally important. Second, standard evaluation metrics focus on assessing the performance of models on the most common values of data distributions. In this paper, we present an approach to tackle imbalanced regression tasks where the objective is to predict extreme (rare) values. We propose an approach to formalise such tasks and to optimise/evaluate predictive models, overcoming the factors mentioned and issues in related work. We present an automatic and non-parametric method to obtain relevance functions, building on the concept of relevance as the mapping of target values into non-uniform domain preferences. Then, we propose SERA, a new evaluation metric capable of assessing the effectiveness and of optimising models towards the prediction of extreme values while penalising severe model bias. An experimental study demonstrates how SERA provides valid and useful insights into the performance of models in imbalanced regression tasks. © 2020, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Abstract

Abstract